<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/inc/acp/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.atmos-chem-phys.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1680-7316</issn>
		<eissn>1680-7324</eissn>
		<volume_number>4</volume_number>
		<issue_number>9/10</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2004</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/acp-4-2401-2004</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/4/2401/2004/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/4/2401/2004/acp-4-2401-2004.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/4/2401/2004/acp-4-2401-2004.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>2401</start_page>
	<end_page>2423</end_page>
	<publication_date>2004-12-02</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">NOGAPS-ALPHA model simulations of stratospheric ozone during the SOLVE2 campaign</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>J. P. McCormack</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="1">
			<name>S. D. Eckermann</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="3" affiliations="1">
			<name>L. Coy</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="4" affiliations="2">
			<name>D. R. Allen</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="5" affiliations="3">
			<name>Y.-J. Kim</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="6" affiliations="3">
			<name>T. Hogan</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="7" affiliations="4">
			<name>B. Lawrence</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="8" affiliations="4">
			<name>A. Stephens</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="9" affiliations="5">
			<name>E. V. Browell</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="10" affiliations="6">
			<name>J. Burris</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="11" affiliations="6">
			<name>T. McGee</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="12" affiliations="5">
			<name>C. R. Trepte</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">E.O. Hulburt Center for Space Research, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington DC, USA</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="2" content_type="html">Remote Sensing Division, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington DC, USA</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="3" content_type="html">Marine Meteorology Division, Naval Research Laboratory, Monterey, California, USA</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="4" content_type="html">British Atmospheric Data Center, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Oxfordshire, UK</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="5" content_type="html">NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia, USA</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="6" content_type="html">NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">This paper presents three-dimensional prognostic O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; simulations
with parameterized gas-phase photochemistry from the new NOGAPS-ALPHA middle atmosphere
forecast model. We compare 5-day NOGAPS-ALPHA hindcasts of
stratospheric O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; with satellite and
DC-8 aircraft measurements for two cases during
the SOLVE II campaign: (1) the cold, isolated vortex during 11-16 January 2003;
and (2) the rapidly developing stratospheric warming of 17-22 January 2003.
In the first case we test three different photochemistry parameterizations.
NOGAPS-ALPHA O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; simulations using the NRL-CHEM2D parameterization give the
best agreement with SAGE III and POAM III profile measurements.
5-day NOGAPS-ALPHA hindcasts of polar O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; initialized with the NASA GEOS4 analyses produce better agreement
with observations than do the operational ECMWF O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; forecasts of case 1.
For case 2, both NOGAPS-ALPHA and ECMWF
114-h forecasts of the split vortex structure in lower stratospheric O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; on 21 January 2003 show comparable skill. Updated
ECMWF O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; forecasts of this event at hour 42 display marked
improvement from the 114-h forecast; corresponding updated 42-hour
NOGAPS-ALPHA prognostic O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; fields initialized with the
GEOS4 analyses do not improve significantly. When NOGAPS-ALPHA
prognostic O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; is initialized with the higher resolution ECMWF O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; analyses, the NOGAPS-ALPHA 42-hour lower stratospheric O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; fields
closely match the operational 42-hour ECMWF O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; forecast of the 21 January event.
We find that stratospheric O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; forecasts
at high latitudes in winter can depend on both model initial
conditions and the treatment of photochemistry over periods of 1-5 days.
Overall, these results show that the new O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; initialization,
photochemistry parameterization,
and spectral transport in the NOGAPS-ALPHA
NWP model can provide reliable short-range stratospheric O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; forecasts
during Arctic winter.</abstract>
	<references>
	</references>
</article>

